[1] Office For National Statistics. United kingdom national accounts-ons. https://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/ukgwa/20160105230758/http://www.ons.gov.uk/ons/rel/naa1-rd/united-kingdom-national-accounts/index.html.
[2] 祁瑞华, 付豪. "一带一路"智库报告主题挖掘与演化研究. 智库理论与实践, 2022, 7(5): 11-19. (Qi R H, Fu H. Topic mining and evolution of "belt and road initiative" report in think tanks. Think Tank: Theory & Practice, 2022, 7(5): 11-19.)
[3] 张雅琪, 柯平. 蓝皮书在中国的发展演变与影响因素分析. 图书情报工作, 2020, 64(23): 3-11. (Zhang Y Q, Ke P. The development and influence factors of blue book in China. Library and Information Service, 2020, 64(23): 3-11.)
[4] 人民网. "智库成果的出版与传播"论坛:人文社会科学的研究成果转化是大趋势-国际-人民网. http://world.people.com.cn/n1/2016/0826/c1002-28668798.html. People's Daily Online. Forum on "Publishing and Dissemination of Think Tank Achievements": The transformation of research achievements in humanities and social sciences is a major trend. People's Daily Online. http://world.people.com.cn/n1/2016/0826/c1002-28668798.html.)
[5] 谢曙光, 蔡继辉, 吴丹. 皮书研创与智库建设. 北京: 社会科学文献出版社, 2014. (Xie S G, Cai J H, Wu D. Pishu Innovations and Think Tank Construction. Beijing: Social Sciences Academic Press, 2014.)
[6] Cios K J, Pedrycz W, Swiniarski R W. Data Mining Methods for Knowledge Discovery. New York: Springer Science & Business Media, 2012.
[7] Joao G. Knowledge Discovery from Data Streams. London: Chapman and Hall/CRC, 2010.
[8] 吴功兴, 琚春华. 融入度相关性与社区识别的社交网络舆情信源发现方法. 系统科学与数学, 2021, 41(9): 2492-2504. (Wu G X, Ju C H. The method used to discover the information source of social network public opinion integrated with degree correlations and community identification. Journal of Systems Science and Mathematical Sciences, 2021, 41(9): 2492-2504.)
[9] Fauzi M A. Knowledge sharing in asia pacific via virtual community platform: A systematic review. International Journal of Web Based Communities, 2019, 15(4): 368-394.
[10] Sweet K S, LeBlanc J K, Stough L M, et al. Community building and knowledge sharing by individuals with disabilities using social media. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 2020, 36(1): 1-11.
[11] Sailunaz K, Alhajj R. Emotion and sentiment analysis from twitter text. Journal of Computational Science, 2019, 36: 101003.
[12] 吴宝, 池仁勇. 融入情感分析与用户热度的社交网络用户可信度量方法. 系统科学与数学, 2021, 41(4): 1091-1107. (Wu B, Chi R Y. A trusted measurement method for social network users that integrates sentiment analysis and user popularity. Journal of Systems Science and Mathematical Sciences, 2021, 41(4): 1091-1107.)
[13] 闫志华, 唐锡晋. 基于动态网络的事件风险演变研究. 系统科学与数学, 2022, 42(10): 2590-2601. (Yan Z H, Tang X J. Exploring the transfer of event risk based on dynamic networks. Journal of Systems Science and Mathematical Sciences, 2022, 42(10): 2590-2601.)
[14] Alabdulkareem A, Frank M R, Sun L, et al. Unpacking the polarization of workplace skills. Science Advances, 2018, 4(7): eaao6030.
[15] Hidalgo C A, Klinger B, Barabási A L, et al. The product space conditions the development of nations. Science, 2007, 317(5837): 482-487.
[16] Ye Y, Zhang Q, Wei X, et al. Equitable access to COVID-19 vaccines makes a life-saving difference to all countries. Nature Human Behaviour, 2022, 6(2): 207-216.
[17] Huang Z A, Wang R. Building a network to "tell China stories well": Chinese diplomatic communication strategies on Twitter. International Journal of Communication, 2019, 13: 2984-3007.
[18] Zheng X, Wang X, Li Z, et al. Donald j. trump's presidency in cyberspace: A case study of social perception and social influence in digital oligarchy era. IEEE Transactions on Computational Social Systems, 2021, 8(2): 279-293.
[19] Coscia M, Giannotti F, Pensa R. Social network analysis as knowledge discovery process: A case study on digital bibliography. International Conference on Advances in Social Network Analysis and Mining, 2009, 279-283.
[20] Holzinger A, Ofner B, Stocker C, et al. On graph entropy measures for knowledge discovery from publication network data. Eds. by Cuzzocrea A, Kittl C, Simos D E, et al. Availability, Reliability, and Security in Information Systems and HCI. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer, 2013, 354-362.
[21] Dooley L, Gubbins C. Inter-organisational knowledge networks: Synthesising dialectic tensions of university-industry knowledge discovery. Journal of Knowledge Management, 2019, 23(10): 2113-2134.
[22] Pradhan T, Pal S. A hybrid personalized scholarly venue recommender system integrating social network analysis and contextual similarity. Future Generation Computer Systems, 2020, 110: 1139-1166.
[23] Huang X, Chen D, Ren T, et al. A survey of community detection methods in multilayer networks. Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery, 2021, 35(1): 1-45.
[24] Bianconi G. Multilayer Networks: Structure and Function. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2018.
[25] 张瑾玉, 夏晨辉, 谷政. 基于agent的多重社会网络中破产传染模型研究. 计算机应用研究, 2021, 38(6): 1709-1717. (Zhang J Y, Xia C H, Gu Z. Research of bankruptcy contagion model in multiplex network based on multiagent. Application Research of Computers, 2021, 38(6): 1709-1717.)
[26] Rodriguez M A, Shinavier J. Exposing multi-relational networks to single-relational network analysis algorithms. Journal of Informetrics, 2010, 4(1): 29-41.
[27] Corsini P, Leoreanu V. Graphs and hypergraphs. Eds. by Corsini P, Leoreanu V. Applications of Hyperstructure Theory. Boston, MA: Springer US, 2003, 55-94.
[28] Nagurney A, Dong J. Supernetworks: Decision-Making for the Information Age. Surrey: Elgar Publicaiton, 2002.
[29] Liu Y, Li Q, Tang X, et al. Superedge prediction: What opinions will be mined based on an opinion supernetwork model? Decision Support Systems, 2014, 64: 118-129.
[30] Ma N, Liu Y. SuperedgeRank algorithm and its application in identifying opinion leader of online public opinion supernetwork-sciencedirect. Expert Systems with Applications, 2014, 41(4, Part 1): 1357-1368.
[31] Chi Y, Tang X, Lian Y, et al. A supernetwork-based online post informative quality evaluation model. Knowledge-Based Systems, 2019, 168: 10-24.
[32] Visheratin A A, Trofimenko T B, Mukhina K D, et al. Urgent information spreading multi-layer model for simulation in mobile networks. Procedia Computer Science, 2016, 80: 2086-2097.
[33] Su Q, McAvoy A, Mori Y, et al. Evolution of prosocial behaviours in multilayer populations: 3. (Nature Human Behaviour, 2022, 6(3): 338-348.
[34] 唐洪婷, 李志宏. 基于超网络演化模型的社区知识发现与分析. 系统工程理论与实践, 2018, 38(3): 765-776. (Tang H T, Li Z H. Identifying and analyzing knowledge in innovation communities based on evolving supernetwork model. Systems Engineering—Theory & Practice, 2018, 38(3): 765-776.)
[35] 马宁, 刘怡君. 基于超网络的舆论领袖识别应用研究. 中国科学院院刊, 2012, 27(5): 586-594. (Ma N, Liu Y J. Recognition of online opinion leaders based on supernetwork analysis. Bulletin of Chinese Academy of Sciences, 2012, 27(5): 586-594.)
[36] 马涛, 索琪. 基于超图的超网络研究综述. 运筹与管理, 2021, 30(2): 232-239. (Ma T, Suo Q. Review of hypernetwork based on hypergraph. Operations Research and Management Science, 2021, 30(2): 232-239.)
[37] Garg N, Schiebinger L, Jurafsky D, et al. Word embeddings quantify 100 years of gender and ethnic stereotypes. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2018, 115(16): E3635-E3644.
[38] Mikolov T, Sutskever I, Chen K, et al. Distributed representations of words and phrases and their compositionality. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 2013, 2: 3111-3119.
[39] Ghoshal G, Zlatić V, Caldarelli G, et al. Random hypergraphs and their applications. Physical Review E, 2009, 79(6): 066118.
[40] Okamoto K, Chen W, Li X Y. Ranking of closeness centrality for large-scale social networks. Eds. by Preparata F P, Wu X, Yin J, Frontiers in Algorithmics. Heidelberg: Springer, 2008, 186-195.
[41] Freeman L C. A set of measures of centrality based on betweenness. Sociometry, 1977, 35-41.
[42] Brandes U. A faster algorithm for betweenness centrality. Journal of Mathematical Sociology, 2010.
[43] Freeman L C, Roeder D, Mulholland R R. Centrality in social networks: II. experimental results. Social Networks, 1979, 2(2): 119-141.
[44] centrality models in real and simulated networks. Social Networks, 1988, 10(3): 233-253.
[45] 孟彬, 马捷, 张龙革. 论知识的生命周期. 图书情报知识, 2006, (3): 92-95. (Meng B, Ma J, Zhang L G. On the life cycle of knowledge. Documentation, Information & Knowledge, 2006, (3): 92-95.)