基于确定性等价进行等权重调整的组合投资策略研究

doi:10.12341/jssms21202

系统科学与数学 ›› 2022, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (2): 287-303.DOI: 10.12341/jssms21202

基于确定性等价进行等权重调整的组合投资策略研究

王宗润, 谭郭玺

中南大学商学院, 长沙 410083

收稿日期:2021-04-26 修回日期:2021-09-03 出版日期:2022-02-25 发布日期:2022-03-21
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金重点项目（71631008）资助课题.

PDF ( 86 ) 引用

王宗润, 谭郭玺. 基于确定性等价进行等权重调整的组合投资策略研究[J]. 系统科学与数学, 2022, 42(2): 287-303.

WANG Zongrun, TAN Guoxi. Research on Combination Portfolio Strategy with Equal Weight Adjustment Based on Certainty Equivalence[J]. Journal of Systems Science and Mathematical Sciences, 2022, 42(2): 287-303.

Research on Combination Portfolio Strategy with Equal Weight Adjustment Based on Certainty Equivalence

WANG Zongrun, TAN Guoxi

School of Business, Central South University, Changsha 410083

Received:2021-04-26 Revised:2021-09-03 Online:2022-02-25 Published:2022-03-21

由于估计误差的存在，均值方差投资策略的样本外表现并不尽如人意，与此同时，等权重投资策略由于没有估计误差和良好的样本外表现而逐渐被关注，且在策略组合中发挥重要作用.因此文章引入等权重投资策略对原有的均值方差资产配置进行调整，基于确定性等价衡量不同投资策略样本外表现的优劣，确定子策略的加权系数，构建组合投资策略.研究结果表明：就单一投资策略而言，均值方差策略在降低标准差、控制风险方面更占优，而等权重策略则在增大夏普比率、提高收益方面发挥更大的作用；就组合投资策略而言，基于确定性等价构建的组合投资策略一方面可以降低投资组合的尾部风险，帮助投资者规避极端损失，另一方面可以显著提高投资组合的夏普比率和索提诺比率，获取更高的风险调整后收益.

关键词： 策略组合, 等权重, 均值方差, 确定性等价, 组合系数

Due to the existence of estimation error, the out-of-sample performance of mean variance investment strategy is not satisfactory. At the same time, equal weight investment strategy is gradually concerned because of its lack of estimation error and good out-of-sample performance, and it plays an important role in combination strategy. Therefore, this paper introduces the equal weight strategy to adjust the original mean variance asset allocation, determines the combination coefficient of sub-strategies based on the certainty equivalence to measure the performance of different investment strategies, constructs the final combination portfolio strategy, and compares the combination portfolio strategy with other investment strategy. The results show that as far as single investment strategy is concerned, the mean variance strategy is superior in reducing standard deviation and controlling risk, while the equal weight strategy is beneficial to increase the Sharp ratio of the asset portfolio and improve return; As far as combination portfolio strategy is concerned, on the one hand, the combination portfolio strategy based on certainty equivalence can reduce the tail risk of portfolio and help investors avoid extreme losses, on the other hand, it can significantly improve Sharpe ratio and Sortino ratio of portfolio and obtain higher risk-adjusted returns.

Key words: Combination strategy, equal weight, mean-variance, certainty equivalence, combination coefficient

MR(2010)主题分类:

91B28

分享此文:

[1] Zhang Y, Li X, Guo S. Portfolio selection problems with Markowitz's mean-variance framework:A review of literature. Fuzzy Optimization and Decision Making, 2018, 17:125-158.
[2] Hsu P, Han Q, Wu W, et al. Asset allocation strategies, data snooping, and the $1/N$ rule. Journal of Banking & Finance, 2018, 97:257-269.
[3] Markowitz H M. Portfolio selection. Journal of Finance, 1952, 7(1):77-91.
[4] Kan R, Smith D R. The distribution of the sample minimum variance frontier. Management Science, 2008, 59(5):70-82.
[5] Zhang M, Chen P. Mean-variance portfolio selection with regime switching under shorting prohibition. Operations Research Letters, 2016, 44(5):658-662.
[6] Simaan M, Simaan Y, Tang Y. Estimation error in mean returns and the mean-variance efficient frontier. International Review of Economics and Finance, 2018, 56:109-124.
[7] Zhang J, Jin Z, An Y. Dynamic portfolio optimization with ambiguity aversion. Journal of Banking & Finance, 2017, 79:95-109.
[8] 郭范勇, 潘和平. 基于β系数优化的动态投资组合策略研究. 中国管理科学, 2019, 27(7):1-10. (Guo F Y, Pan H P. Dynamic portfolio management strategy with adaptive β coefficients. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2019, 27(7):1-10.)
[9] 孙会霞, 倪宣明, 钱龙, 等. 基于长期CVaR约束的高频投资组合优化. 系统科学与数学, 2021, 41(2):344-360. (Sun H X, Ni X M, Qian L, et al. High-Frequency portfolio optimization with long-term CVaR constriants. Journal of Systems Science and Mathematical Sciences, 2021, 41(2):344-360.)
[10] Jobson D J, Korkie B M. Estimation for Markowitz efficient portfolios. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 1980, 75:544-554.
[11] DeMiguel V, Garlappi L, Uppal R. Optimal versus naive diversification:How inefficient is the $1/N$ portfolio strategy?. Review of Financial Studies, 2009, 22(5):1915-1953.
[12] Fletcher J. Risk reduction and mean-variance analysis:An empirical investigation. J. Bus. Finance Account, 2009, 36(7-8):951-971.
[13] Haensly P J. Risk decomposition, estimation error, and naive diversification. The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, 2020, 52:101146.
[14] Platanakis E, Sutcliffe C, Ye X. Horses for courses:Mean-variance for asset allocation and $1/N$ for stock selection. European Journal of Operational Research, 2021, 288(1):302-317.
[15] Jiang C, Ma Y, An Y. International diversification benefits:An investigation from Chinese investors' perspective. China Finance Rev. Int., 2013, 3(3):225-249.
[16] Benartzi S, Thaler R H. Naive diversification strategies in defined contribution saving plans. Am. Econ. Rev., 2001, 91(1):79-98.
[17] Cai H, Schmidt A B. Comparing mean-variance portfolios and equal-weight portfolios for major US equity indexes. Journal of Asset Management, 2020, 21(4):326-332.
[18] Estrada J. Mean-semivariance behavior:Downside risk and capital asset pricing. International Review of Economics and Finance, 2005, 16(2):169-185.
[19] Platen E. Portfolio selection and asset pricing under a benchmark approach. Physica A:Statistical Mechanics and Its Applications, 2006, 370(1):23-29.
[20] Nicolae G, Stavros P. What to expect when everyone is expecting:Self-fulfilling expectations and asset-pricing puzzles. Journal of Financial Economics, 2021, 140(1):54-73.
[21] 周忠宝, 刘湘晖, 肖和录, 等. 基于线性反馈策略的多阶段均值-方差投资组合优化. 系统科学与数学, 2018, 38(9):1018-1035. (Zhou Z B, Liu X H, Xiao H L, et al. Multi-period mean-variance portfolio optimization based on the linear feedback strategy. Journal of Systems Science and Mathematical Sciences, 2018, 38(9):1018-1035.)
[22] 刘海飞, 李心丹, 柏巍, 等. 基于波动持续性的最优组合构建与分散化研究. 管理科学学报, 2019, 22(1):44-56. (Liu H F, Li X D, Bai W, et al. Optimal portfolio and diversification based on persistent volatility. Journal of Management Sciences in China, 2019, 22(1):44-56.)
[23] Nystrup P, Boyd S, Lindström E, et al. Multi-period portfolio selection with drawdown control. Annals of Operations Research, 2019, 282(1):245-271.
[24] 黄羿, 祝炜, 朱书尚, 等. 结合"向后看"和"向前看"信息的投资组合优化. 系统工程理论与实践, 2021, 41(4):861-881. (Huang Y, Zhu W, Zhu S S, et al. Combining backward-looking information and forward-looking information in portfolio optimization. Systems Engineering-Theory & Practice, 2021, 41(4):861-881.)
[25] Kan R, Zhou G. Optimal portfolio choice with parameter uncertainty. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 2007, 42:621-656.
[26] Tu J, Zhou G. Markowitz meets Talmud:A combination of sophisticated and naive diversification strategies. Journal of Financial Economics, 2011, 99(1):204-215.
[27] Jiang C, Du J, An Y. Combining the minimum-variance and equally-weighted portfolios:Can portfolio performance be improved?. Economic Modelling, 2019, 80:260-274.
[28] 乔鸽, 周建红, 李新民. 广义线性模型下模型平均的比较研究. 系统科学与数学, 2021, 41(4):1164-1180. (Qiao G, Zhou J H, Li X M. A comparative study of model averaging for generalized linear models. Journal of Systems Science and Mathematical Sciences, 2021, 41(4):1164-1180.)
[29] Kazak E, Pohlmeier W. Testing out-of-sample portfolio performance. International Journal of Forecasting, 2019, 35(2):540-554.
[30] Choi I, Jeong H. Model selection for factor analysis:Some new criteria and performance comparisons. Econometric Reviews, 2019, 38(6):577-596.
[31] Warren G J. Choosing and using utility functions in forming portfolios. Financial Analysts Journal, 2019, 75(3):39-69.
[32] Cheng P Y K. Risk willingness and perceived utilities to explain risky investment choices:A behavioral model. The Journal of Behavioral Finance, 2019, 20(3):255-266.
[33] Xidonas P, Mavrotas G, Hassapis C, et al. Robust multiobjective portfolio optimization:A minimax regret approach. European Journal of Operational Research, 2017, 262(1):299-305.
[34] 姜树广, 韦倩, 沈梁军. 认知能力、行为偏好与个人金融决策. 管理科学学报, 2021, 24(1):19-32. (Jiang S G, Wei Q, Shen L J. Cognitive ability, behavioral preference and individual financial decision-making. Journal of Management Sciences in China, 2021, 24(1):19-32.)
[35] 张新雨, 邹国华. 模型平均方法及其在预测中的应用. 统计研究, 2011, 28(6):97-102. (Zhang X Y, Zou G H. Model averaging method and its application in forecast. Statistical Research, 2011, 28(6):97-102.)
[36] Suh S. A combination rule for portfolio selection with transaction costs. International Review of Finance, 2016, 16(3):393-420.

[1]	赵远英，徐登可，段星德. 非线性均值方差模型的贝叶斯数据删除统计诊断[J]. 系统科学与数学, 2020, 40(1): 171-179.
[2]	林路，李锋，朱力行. 均值波动率回归[J]. 系统科学与数学, 2015, 35(12): 1383-1401.

阅读次数

全文

摘要