王泽林1, 王应明2,3
王泽林, 王应明. 随机视角下的二维二元语义多属性群决策方法[J]. 系统科学与数学, 2022, 42(5): 1161-1177.
WANG Zelin, WANG Yingming. Multiple Attribute Group Decision Making Method Based on Two-Dimension 2-Tuple Linguistic from a Stochastic Perspective[J]. Journal of Systems Science and Mathematical Sciences, 2022, 42(5): 1161-1177.
WANG Zelin1, WANG Yingming2,3
MR(2010)主题分类:
分享此文:
[1] Yue Q, Zhang L L. Two-sided matching for hesitant fuzzy numbers in smart intelligent technique transfer. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 2020, 139:106643. [2] Tesfamariam S, Sadiq R, Najjaran H. Decision making under uncertainty-An example for seismic risk management. Risk Analysis, 2010, 30(1):78-94. [3] Triantaphyllou E, Lin C T. Development and evaluation of five fuzzy multiattribute decisionmaking methods. International Journal of Approximate Reasoning, 1996, 14(4):281-310. [4] 乐琦,张莉莉.基于新排序函数的直觉模糊双边匹配决策方法.控制与决策, 2020, 35(4):985-992.(Yue Q, Zhang L L. Decision method for intuitionistic fuzzy two-sided matching based on the new ranking function. Control and Decision, 2020, 35(4):985-992.) [5] Zadeh L A. The concept of a linguistic variable and its application to approximate reasoning-I. Information Sciences, 1975, 8(3):199-249. [6] Herrera F, Mart′ınez L. A 2-tuple fuzzy linguistic representation model for computing with words. IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, 2000, 8(6):746-752. [7] Labella á, Dutta B, Mart′ınez L. An optimal Best-Worst prioritization method under a 2-tuple linguistic environment in decision making. Computers&Industrial Engineering, 2021, 155:107141. [8] Mart′ınez L, Herrera F. An overview on the 2-tuple linguistic model for computing with words in decision making:Extensions, applications and challenges. Information Sciences, 2012, 207:1-18. [9] Dong Y C, Herrera-Viedma E. Consistency-driven automatic methodology to set interval numerical scales of 2-tuple linguistic term sets and its use in the linguistic GDM with preference relation. IEEE Transactions on Cybernetics, 2015, 45(4):780-792. [10] 王欣荣,樊治平.基于二元语义信息处理的一种语言群决策方法.管理科学学报, 6(5):1-5.(Wang X Y, Fan Z P. Method for group decision making based on two tuple linguistic information processing. Journal of Management Sciences in China, 2003, 6(5):1-5.) [11] 卫东,周光中,杨善林.基于二维语言评价信息的群体决策方法.系统工程,2009, 27(2):113-118.(Zhu W D, Zhou G Z, Yang S L. An approach to group decision making based on 2-dimension linguistic assessment information. Systems Engineering, 2009, 27(2):113-118. [12] 张晨,周光中,朱卫东.基于两维语义证据推理的科学基金项目专家评议系统研究.中国软科学, 2011,(2):176-182.(Zhang C, Zhou G Z, Zhu W D. Research on peer review system for the national science foundation based on two-dimensional semantics evidence reasoning. China Soft Science, 2011,(2):176-182.) [13] Liu P D. An approach to group decision making based on 2-dimension uncertain linguistic information. Technological and Economic Development of Economy, 2012, 18(3):424-437. [14] Zhu H, Zhao J B, Xu Y. 2-dimension linguistic computational model with 2-tuples for multiattribute group decision making. Knowledge-Based Systems, 2016, 103:132-142. [15] Yu X H, Xu Z S, Liu S S, et al. Multicriteria decision making with 2-dimension linguistic aggregation techniques. International Journal of Intelligent Systems, 2012, 27(6):539-562. [16] Liu P D, Yu X C. 2-Dimension uncertain linguistic power generalized weighted aggregation operator and its application in multiple attribute group decision making. Knowledge-Based Systems, 2014, 57:69-80. [17] Liu P D, He L, Yu X C. Generalized hybrid aggregation operators based on the 2-dimension uncertain linguistic information for multiple attribute group decision making. Group Decision and Negotiation, 2016, 25(1):103-126. [18] 王泽林,王应明.权重信息完全未知的二维二元语义多属性群决策方法.控制与决策, 2019, 34(9):1999-2009.(Wang Z L, Wang Y M. A method for multiple attribute group decision making with complete unknown weight information based on 2-dimension 2-tuple linguistic information. Control and Decision, 2019, 34(9):1999-2009.) [19] Wu Y N, Sun X K, Lu Z M, et al. Optimal site selection of straw biomass power plant under 2-dimension uncertain linguistic environment. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2019, 212:1179-1192. [20] Zhao J B, Zhu H, Li H. 2-dimension linguistic PROMETHEE methods for multiple attribute decision making. Expert Systems with Applications, 2019, 127:97-108. [21] Wang Z L, Rodr′ıguez R M, Wang Y M, et al. A two-stage minimum adjustment consensus model for large scale decision making based on reliability modeled by two-dimension 2-tuple linguistic information. Computers&Industrial Engineering, 2020, 151(3):106973. [22] Lahdelma R, Hokkanen J, Salminen P. SMAA-stochastic multiobjective acceptability analysis. European Journal of Operational Research, 1998, 106(1):137-143. [23] Lahdelma R, Miettinen K, Salminen P. Ordinal criteria in stochastic multicriteria acceptability analysis (SMAA). European Journal of Operational Research, 2003, 147(1):117-127. [24] Corrente S, Greco S, Nicotra M, et al. Evaluating and comparing entrepreneurial ecosystems using SMAA and SMAA-S. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 2019, 44(2):485-519. [25] 朱运霞,昂胜,杨锋.基于SMAA和公共权重的决策单元效率评价与排序.运筹与管理, 2021, 30(4):184-189.(Zhu Y X, Ang S, Yang F. Efficiency evaluation and ranking for decision making units based on SMAA and common weight. Operations Research and Management Science, 2021, 30(4):184-189.) [26] Lahdelma R, Salminen P. SMAA-2:Stochastic multicriteria acceptability analysis for group decision making. Operations Research, 2001, 49(3):444-454. [27] Zhu H, Zhao J, Xu Y. 2-dimension linguistic computational model with 2-tuples for multiattribute group decision making. Knowledge-Based Systems, 2016, 103:132-142. [28] 盛骤.概率论与数理统计.北京:高等教育出版社,2001.(Sheng Z. Probability Theory and Mathematical Statistics. Beijing:Higher Education Press, 2001.) [29] 马珍珍,米传民,党耀国,等.考虑语义灰度的二元语义群决策方法.系统工程, 2014, 11(32):132-138.(Ma Z Z, Mi C M, Dang Y G, et al. A 2-tuple linguistic group decision making method considering linguistic degree of greyness. Systems Engineering, 2014, 11(32):132-138.) |
[1] | 付超, 盛松, 常文军. 考虑缺失属性的多属性群决策方法[J]. 系统科学与数学, 2022, 42(4): 920-934. |
[2] | 彭娟娟, 田超. 社交网络环境下基于单值中智信息的大规模群决策方法[J]. 系统科学与数学, 2022, 42(4): 935-954. |
[3] | 张兴贤, 王应明. 一种考虑证据权重和可靠性的混合型多属性群决策方法[J]. 系统科学与数学, 2021, 41(5): 1305-1327. |
[4] | 彭定洪, 张文华. 智慧无废城市评选的序贯式群决策 EDAS 法[J]. 系统科学与数学, 2021, 41(3): 688-704. |
[5] | 张俊芳,周礼刚,金自强. 基于Pythagorean犹豫模糊熵和交叉熵的绩效评价方法[J]. 系统科学与数学, 2021, 41(2): 436-448. |
[6] | 王韧, 陈明. 基于改进Min-Max权重优化模型的语意评价矩阵群决策研究[J]. 系统科学与数学, 2021, 41(11): 3181-3192. |
[7] | 武文顺,李应,倪志伟,朱旭辉,伍章俊. 概率犹豫模糊Maclaurin几何对称平均算子及其群决策模型[J]. 系统科学与数学, 2020, 40(6): 1074-1080. |
[8] | 杨艺. 基于全序关系与A-DHFHW算子的DHFMAGDM方法及其应用[J]. 系统科学与数学, 2020, 40(5): 871-890. |
[9] | 吴凡,赵勇,陈阳. 一个基于夹角测度的群决策结果稳定性的定量分析方法研究[J]. 系统科学与数学, 2017, 37(4): 1063-1071. |
[10] | 金飞飞,倪志伟,李亚平. 基于犹豫乘性偏好关系的群决策方法[J]. 系统科学与数学, 2017, 37(1): 226-238. |
[11] | 魏翠萍,葛淑娜. 犹豫模糊语言幂均算子及其在群决策中的应用[J]. 系统科学与数学, 2016, 36(8): 1308-1317. |
[12] | 陈振松,李延来,Kwai-Sang Chin. 基于T2ITrFHA算子与T2ITrFHG算子联合的多准则群决策方法[J]. 系统科学与数学, 2016, 36(5): 649-670. |
[13] | 丁若,杨然,杨鹏,徐皓. 航天工程方案决策中的改进专家权重调整算法及应用[J]. 系统科学与数学, 2016, 36(12): 2234-2241. |
[14] | 秦娟,陈振颂,李延来. 基于改进犹豫模糊熵的群体MULTMOORA决策方法[J]. 系统科学与数学, 2016, 36(12): 2375-2392. |
[15] | 周晓辉,姚俭. 基于Choquet积分的区间直觉梯形模糊多属性群决策[J]. 系统科学与数学, 2015, 35(2): 245-256. |
阅读次数 | ||||||
全文 |
|
|||||
摘要 |
|
|||||