基于改进三次差异驱动的区间数动态多属性决策方法

doi:10.12341/jssms22575

对于属性权重未知属性值为区间数的动态多属性决策问题, 提出基于改进三次差异驱动的多属性决策方法.此方法吸收三次差异驱动的优秀思想,并对其进行改进, 进而将其扩展至区间数领域,在综合考虑不同属性的重要程度不同时刻备选对象的差异的基础上,引入了“能量”消耗指数, 从整体角度分析备选对象发展变化中的不同波动情况, 获得科学的排序结果,为决策者提供决策参考.最后通过算例分析及与其他方法比较分析,进一步验证了方法的科学性与可行性.

关键词： 动态多属性决策, 区间数, 三次差异驱动, “能量”消耗指数

For the dynamic multi-attribute decision making problem with unknown attribute weight and interval number attribute value, a multi-attribute decision making method based on improved three stage difference driving is proposed. It is improved by absorbing and improving the excellent idea of three stage difference driving, and extended to the field of interval number; on the basis of comprehensively considering the importance of different attributes and the differences of candidate objects at different times, the “energy” consumption index is introduced to analyze the different fluctuations in the development and change of candidate objects from an overall perspective, so as to obtain scientific ranking results and provide decision-making reference for decision-makers. Finally, through the example analysis and comparative analysis with other methods, the scientificity and feasibility of the method are further verified.

Key words: Dynamic multiple attribute decision making, interval number, three stage difference driving, “energy” consumption index

MR(2010)主题分类:

90B50

分享此文:

[1] Li J, Wang P, Tao X Y, et al. Productivity analysis for banks' merger and acquisition using two-stage DEA:Evidence from China. Journal of Systems Science and Information, 2021, 9(6):627-659.
[2] Ma H W, Geng B X, Fu Y X, et al. Efficiency analysis of industrial water treatment in China based on two-stage undesirable fixed-sum output DEA model. Journal of Systems Science and Information, 2021, 9(6):660-680.
[3] 李美娟, 易思成, 邱启荣, 等. 基于TOPSIS的动态三角模糊多属性决策方法.系统科学与数学, 2022, 42(3):614-625. (Li M J, Yi S C, Qiu Q R, et al. Dynamic triangular fuzzy multi-attribute decision-making method based on TOPSIS. Journal of Systems Science and Mathematical Sciences, 2022, 42(3):614-625.)
[4] 曹倩, 刘小弟, 张世涛, 等. 概率信息完全未知的概率犹豫模糊多属性决策方法.系统科学与数学, 2020, 40(7):1242-1256. (Cao Q, Liu X D, Zhang S T, et al. Probabilistic hesitant fuzzy multi-attribute decision making method with completely unknown probability information. Journal of Systems Science and Mathematical Sciences, 2020, 40(7):1242-1256.)
[5] Dong F Y, Wu L L, Shen H. Dynamic multi-attribute decision analysis on three-parameter interval grey number of upper (lower) deviation quasi-normal distribution. Journal of Systems Science and Information, 2022, 10(3):280-296.
[6] 达庆利, 徐泽水. 不确定多属性决策的单目标最优化模型.系统工程学报, 2002, (1):50-55. (Da Q L, Xu Z S. Singule-objective optimization model in uncertain multi-attribute decisionmaking. Journal of Systems Engineering, 2002, (1):50-55.)
[7] 徐泽水. 拓展的C-OWA算子及其在不确定多属性决策中的应用.系统工程理论与实践, 2005, 25(11):9-15. (Xu Z S. Extended C-OWA operators and their use in uncertain multi-attribute decision making. Systems Engineering-Theory & Practice, 2005, 25(11):9-15.)
[8] Atanu S, Tapan K P. On comparing interval numbers. European Journal of Operational Research, 2000, 127(1):28-43.
[9] Ramon M, Weldon L. Interval analysis and fuzzy set theory. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 2003, 135(1):5-9.
[10] LI K W, Wang Z J, Tong X. Acceptability analysis and priority weight elicitation for interval multiplicative comparison matrices. European Journal of Operational Research, 2016, 250(2):628-638.
[11] 李伟伟, 郭亚军, 易平涛, 等. 基于协商视角的客观自主式综合评价方法.系统管理学报, 2012, 21(3):378-383. (Li W W, Guo Y J, Yi P T, et al. An objective self-determining comprehensive evaluation method based on collaborative perspective. Journal of Systems & Management, 2012, 21(3):378-383.)
[12] 刘健, 刘思峰, 吴顺祥. 基于优势关系的多属性决策对象排序研究.控制与决策, 2012, 27(4):632-635. (Liu J, Liu S F, Wu S X. Ranking research based on dominant relation for multiple-attribute decision making object. Control and Decision, 2012, 27(4):632-635.)
[13] 张方伟, 王炜, 赵德. 一种基于分层法的区间数多属性决策方法及应用.系统工程理论与实践, 2014, 34(11):2881-2884. (Zhang F W, Wang W, Zhao D. Method for multiple attributes decision-making with intervals based on layer method and its application. Systems Engineering-Theory & Practice, 2014, 34(11):2881-2884.)
[14] 常志朋, 程龙生, 刘家树. 基于马田系统与TOPSIS的区间数多属性决策方法.系统工程理论与实践, 2014, 34(1):168-175. (Chang Z P, Cheng L S, Liu J S. Multiple attribute decision making method with intervals based on Mahalanobis-Taguchi system and TOPSIS method. Systems Engineering-Theory & Practice, 2014, 34(1):168-175.)
[15] 王霞. 基于改进TOPSIS的三参数区间灰数多属性决策方法.系统科学与数学, 2021, 41(5):1328-1338. (Wang X. Multi-attribute decision making method based on improved TOPSIS under threeparameter interval grey number. Journal of Systems Science and Mathematical Sciences, 2021, 41(5):1328-1338.)
[16] 梁薇, 王应明. 考虑群体一致性的区间犹豫模糊TOPSIS决策方法.系统科学与数学, 2020, 40(7):1146-1156. (Liang W, Wang Y M. Interval-valued hesitant fuzzy TOPSIS decision making method with group consistency. Journal of Systems Science and Mathematical Sciences, 2020, 40(7):1146-1156.)
[17] 卫贵武, 魏宇. 对方案有偏好的区间数多属性灰色关联决策模型.中国管理科学, 2008, (1):158-162. (Wei G W, Wei Y. Model of grey relational analysis for interval multiple attribute decision making with preference information on alternatives. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2008, (1):158-162.)
[18] 刘人境, 高曦含, 张光军. 基于灰熵模型的区间型指标和权重的不确定多属性决策方法及其应用.控制与决策, 2020, 35(3):657-666. (Liu R J, Gao X H, Zhang G J. The uncertain multi-attribute decision making methods and application based on grey entropy model with interval-type attribute values and weights. Control and Decision, 2020, 35(3):657-666.)
[19] 苏志欣, 王理, 夏国平. 区间数动态多属性决策的VIKOR扩展方法.控制与决策, 2010, 25(6):836-840. (Su Z X, Wang L, Xia G P. Extended VIKOR method for dynamic multi-attribute decision making with interval numbers. Control and Decision, 2010, 25(6):836-840.)
[20] 郭亚军. 综合评价理论、方法及应用. 北京:科学出版社, 2007. (Guo Y J. Comprehensive Evaluation Theory, Method and Application. Beijing:Science Press, 2007.)
[21] 张发明, 孙文龙. 改进的动态激励综合评价方法及应用.系统工程学报, 2015, 30(5):711-718. (Zhang F M, Sun W L. Improved dynamic incentive comprehensive evaluation method and its application. Journal of Systems Engineering, 2015, 30(5):711-718.)
[22] 李美娟, 陈国宏, 林志炳, 等. 基于理想解法的动态评价方法研究.中国管理科学, 2015, 23(10):156-161. (Li M J, Chen G H, Lin Z B, et al. Dynamic evaluation method based on TOPSIS. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2015, 23(10):156-161.)
[23] 李美娟, 袁宁, 徐林明. 基于正交投影法的动态评价方法.中国管理科学, 2020, 28(12):208-219. (Li M J, Yuan N, Xu L M. Dynamic evaluation method based on vertical projection method. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2020, 28(12):208-219.)
[24] 李美娟, 李晓轩, 徐林明. 基于改进理想解法的动态评价方法研究.系统科学与数学, 2016, 36(10):1659- 1669. (Li M J, Li X X, Xu L M. Dynamic evaluation method based on improved TOPSIS. Journal of Systems Science and Mathematical Sciences, 2016, 36(10):1659-1669.)
[25] 徐林明, 李美娟, 戴前智. 基于灰靶理论的动态评价方法.系统科学与数学, 2017, 37(1):112-124. (Xu L M, Li M J, Dai Q Z. Dynamic evaluation method based on grey target theory. Journal of Systems Science and Mathematical Sciences, 2017, 37(1):112-124.)
[26] Xu L M, Lu J C, Li M J, et al. Dynamic evaluation and analysis of regional innovation capability in eastern China from the perspective of high-quality development. Journal of Systems Science and Information, 2021, 9(6):608-626.
[27] 郭亚军, 胡蕾, 王志刚. 具有三次差异驱动特征的动态综合评价方法.系统工程学报, 2011, 26(4):546-550. (Guo Y J, Hu L, Wang Z G. Method of dynamic comprehensive evaluation based on three stage difference driving features. Journal of Systems Engineering, 2011, 26(4):546-550.)
[28] 徐泽水, 孙在东. 一类不确定型多属性决策问题的排序方法.管理科学学报, 2002, (3):35-39. (Xu Z S, Sun Z D. Priority method for a kind of multi-attribute decision-making problems. Journal of Management Science in China, 2002, (3):35-39.)
[29] 吴江, 黄登仕. 区间数排序方法研究综述.系统工程, 2004, (8):1-4. (Wu J, Huang D S. Ranking interval numbers:A review. Systems Engineering, 2004, (8):1-4.)
[30] 孙海龙, 姚卫星. 区间数排序方法评述.系统工程学报, 2010, 25(3):304-312. (Sun H L, Yao W X. Comments on methods for ranking interval numbers. Journal of Systems Engineering, 2010, 25(3):304-312.)
[31] 高峰记. 可能度及区间数综合排序.系统工程理论与实践, 2013, 33(8):2033-2040. (Gao F J. Possibility degree and comprehensive priority of interval numbers. Systems Engineering-Theory & Practice, 2013, 33(8):2033-2040.)
[32] 徐泽水, 达庆利. 区间数排序的可能度法及其应用.系统工程学报, 2003, (1):67-70. (Xu Z S, Da Q L. Possibility degree method for ranking interval numbers and its application. Journal of Systems Engineering, 2003, (1):67-70.)
[33] 李德清, 谷云东. 一种基于可能度的区间数排序方法.系统工程学报, 2008, 23(2):243-246. (Li D Q, Gu Y D. Method for ranking interval numbers based on possibility degree. Journal of Systems Engineering, 2008, 23(2):243-246.)
[34] Xu Z S. On multi-period multi-attribute decision making. Knowledge-Based Systems, 2008, 21(2):164-171.

[1]	柯丽华,唐华倩,王其虎,胡南燕,肖泽宇. 基于二元联系数可能度函数的区间数排序方法及应用[J]. 系统科学与数学, 2023, 43(2): 417-430.
[2]	李美娟, 易思成, 邱启荣, 林琦. 基于TOPSIS的动态三角模糊多属性决策方法[J]. 系统科学与数学, 2022, 42(3): 614-625.
[3]	李美娟, 潘瑜昕, 徐林明, 卢锦呈. 改进区间数动态 TOPSIS 评价方法[J]. 系统科学与数学, 2021, 41(7): 1891-1904.
[4]	王旭, 王应明, 蓝以信, 温槟檐. 基于双前沿面数据包络分析的区间全局 Meta-frontier Malmquist 指数及其应用研究[J]. 系统科学与数学, 2021, 41(4): 1043-1067.
[5]	黄衍, 尤翠玲, 何霄. 考虑随机分布的中立型区间交叉效率研究[J]. 系统科学与数学, 2021, 41(12): 3517-3529.
[6]	高志方，刘亚楠，彭定洪. 云制造稳定性控制的区间犹豫模糊控制图方法[J]. 系统科学与数学, 2019, 39(7): 1017-1030.
[7]	蓝以信，王旭，王应明. 区间型产出下的DEA-Malmquist 生产率指数及其应用研究[J]. 系统科学与数学, 2017, 37(6): 1494-1508.
[8]	高作峰，邹正兴，马栋. 局中人具有偏好关系的区间合作对策问题[J]. 系统科学与数学, 2013, 33(5): 528-540.
[9]	李为相，李帮义. 一种基于支持向量域描述的区间数分类[J]. 系统科学与数学, 2012, 32(3): 319-326.
[10]	丁邦俊. 利用区间删失数据的分布函数估计及其收敛速度[J]. 系统科学与数学, 2008, 28(6): 641-648.
[11]	陈旭瑾;胡捷;胡晓东. 带区间数据的最小风险斯坦纳树问题[J]. 系统科学与数学, 2008, 28(11): 1310-1322.

阅读次数

全文

摘要

基于改进三次差异驱动的区间数动态多属性决策方法

Dynamic Interval Number Multi-Attribute Decision Making Method Based on Improved Three Stage Difference Driving