基于双边库存风险的供应链契约研究

doi:10.12341/jssms22311

系统科学与数学 ›› 2023, Vol. 43 ›› Issue (4): 947-960.DOI: 10.12341/jssms22311

• • 上一篇

基于双边库存风险的供应链契约研究

刘同, 宋璇, 蹇明

西南交通大学交通运输与物流学院, 成都 611031

收稿日期:2022-04-27 修回日期:2023-01-08 发布日期:2023-02-11
通讯作者: 蹇明, Email:jianming@swjtu.edu.cn
基金资助:
国家社会科学基金资助项目(18BGL104) 资助课题.

PDF ( 15 ) 引用

刘同, 宋璇, 蹇明. 基于双边库存风险的供应链契约研究[J]. 系统科学与数学, 2023, 43(4): 947-960.

LIU Tong, SONG Xuan, JIAN Ming. Supply Chain Contract Based on Bilateral Inventory Risk[J]. Journal of Systems Science and Mathematical Sciences, 2023, 43(4): 947-960.

Supply Chain Contract Based on Bilateral Inventory Risk

LIU Tong, SONG Xuan, JIAN Ming

School of Transportation and Logistics, Southwest Jiaotong University, Chengdu 610031

Received:2022-04-27 Revised:2023-01-08 Published:2023-02-11

市场需求的不确定性会在很大程度上影响供应链参与者的实际收益,在选择供应链契约的时候不仅要考虑利益的合理分配,还要考虑获得相应收益时决策者所承担的风险大小,以此来衡量市场需求变化可能会造成的损失.首先构建基于双边库存风险的供应链契约模型,对比常见供应链契约分析其参数对双边库存风险的分担情况,分析风险视角下的契约等价性;然后考虑双边库存风险产生的概率以及所造成的损失,分析决策者基于风险角度对常见供应链契约的选择;最后以供应链参与者分担相同的风险以及实现帕累托优化为目标,得到了基于双边库存风险的供应链契约协调条件,同时对比常见供应链契约得到其基于风险角度的等价条件.

关键词： 双边库存风险, 契约等价性, 契约选择, 供应链协调

Uncertainty in market demand significantly affects the real benefits of supply chain participants. It is necessary to consider the reasonable distribution of benefits when choosing a supply chain contract, as well as the risk of getting the corresponding benefits, so as to measure the losses caused by changes in market demand. Firstly, the supply chain contract was constructed on the basis of the risk of stockout and overstock. Compared to the common supply chain contract, it analyzed the sharing of bilateral inventory risk through its parameters and the equivalence of the contract from a risk point of view. Secondly, the decision-maker’s selection of the common supply chain contract was analyzed in two respects: The probability of bilateral inventory risk and the resulting losses. Finally, the coordination conditions of the supply chain contract based on a bilateral inventory risk were obtained with the aim of sharing the same risk and achieving Pareto optimization, and the equivalent conditions from the risk perspective were achieved by comparing with the common supply chain contract.

Key words: Bilateral inventory risk, contract equivalence, contract selection, supply chain coordination

MR(2010)主题分类:

91B06

分享此文:

[1] Simchi-Levi D. Designing and Managing the Supply Chain. New York:Mcgraw-Hill College, 2005.
[2] Cachon G P. Supply chain coordination with contracts. Handbooks in Operations Research and Management Science, 2003, 11(11):25-35.
[3] Lariviere M, Porteus E. Selling to the newsvendor:An analysis of price-only contracts. Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, 2001, 3(4):293-305.
[4] Arrow K J, Harris T, Marschak J. Optimal inventory policy. Econometrica, 1951, 19(3):250-272.
[5] Khouja M. A note on the newsboy problem with an emergency supply option. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 1996, 47(12):1530-1534.
[6] 韩东东, 施国洪, 马汉武. 供应链管理中的风险防范. 工业工程, 2002, 3:37-41. (Han D D, Shi G H, Ma H W. Risk evading in supply chain management. Industrial Engineering Journal, 2002, 3:37-41.)
[7] Kaki A, Liesio J, Salo A, et al. Newsvendor decisions under supply uncertainty. International Journal of Production Research, 2015, 53(5):1544-1560.
[8] 张霖霖, 杨越, 周永圣, 等. 考虑顾客退货的风险规避双渠道供应链协调机制研究. 系统科学与数学, 2020, 40(11):2017-2040. (Zhang L L, Yang Y, Zhou Y S, et al. Research on coordination mechanism of dual-channel supply chain with risk avoidance considering customer returns. Journal of Systems Science and Mathematical Sciences, 2020, 40(11):2017-2040.
[9] Whitin T M. Weintraub's dynamic analyses. Kyklos, 1955, 8(3):301-303.
[10] Song J S, Zhang H, Hou Y, et al. The effect of lead time and demand uncertainties in (r, q) inventory systems. Operations Research, 2010, 58(1):68-80.
[11] 陈弘, 周宗放, 刘名武. 批量需求模式下的随机库存管理策略. 系统工程, 2011, 29(8):21-23. (Chen H, Zhou Z F, Liu M W. Stochastic inventory management policies under batch demand. Systems Engineering, 2011, 29(8):21-23.)
[12] Raza S A. A distribution free approach to newsvendor problem with pricing. A Quarterly Journal of Operations Research, 2014, 12(4):355-358.
[13] 蹇明, 方新, 靳留乾, 等. 基于期望准则和分布自由的回购契约协调模型. 管理科学学报, 2016, 19(9):67-78. (Jian M, Fang X, Jin L Q, et al. Coordination model of buyback contract based on expected revenue criterion and distribution-free demand. Journal of Management Sciences in China, 2016, 19(9):67-78.)
[14] Cachon G P, Lariviere M A. Supply chain coordination with revenue-sharing contracts:Strengths and limitations. Management Science, 2005, 51(1):30-44.
[15] Pasternack B A. Optimal pricing and return policies for perishable commodities. Marketing Science, 1985, 4(1):131-132.
[16] Tsay A A, Lovejoy W S. Quantity flexibility contracts and supply chain performance. Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, 1999, 1(2):89-111.
[17] Barnes-Schuster D, Bassok Y, Anupindi R. Coordination and flexibility in supply contracts with options. Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, 2002, 4(3):171-207.
[18] 杨德礼, 郭琼, 何勇, 等. 供应链契约研究进展. 管理学报, 2006, 1(1):117-125. (Yang D L, Guo Q, He Y, et al. Review of supply chain contracts. Chinese Journal of Management, 2006, 1(1):117-125.)
[19] Zhang Y, Donohue K, Cui T H. Contract preferences and performance for the loss-averse supplier:Buyback vs. revenue sharing. Management Science, 2015, 62(6):1734-1754.
[20] Sarvary M, Padmanabhan V. The informational role of manufacturer returns policies:How they can help in learning the demand. Marketing Letters, 2001, 12(4):341-350.
[21] Taylor T A. Supply chain coordination under channel rebates with sales effort effects. Management Science, 2002, 48(8):992-1007.
[22] Taylor T, Xiao W. Incentives for retailer forecasting:Rebates vs. returns. Management Science, 2009, 55(10):1654-1669.
[23] Katok E, Wu D Y. Contracting in supply chains:A laboratory investigation. Management Science, 2009, 55(12):1953-1968.
[24] Kaya O. Outsourcing vs. in-house production:A comparison of supply chain contracts with effort dependent demand. Omega, 2011, 39(2):168-178.
[25] Chakraborty T, Chauhan S S, Vidyarthi N. Coordination and competition in a common retailer channel:Wholesale price versus revenue-sharing mechanisms. International Journal of Production Economics, 2015, 166:103-118.

[1]	李红萍, 龚本刚, 党秀静, 陈久美. 基于信用保险的供应链决策模型与协调策略研究[J]. 系统科学与数学, 2022, 42(8): 2180-2197.
[2]	陈志明, 张贵萍, 唐龙海. 三级OEM供应链在供需波动下的定价与批量协同决策[J]. 系统科学与数学, 2022, 42(11): 2942-2958.
[3]	吴江, 杜亚倩, 张聊东. 考虑产品绿色度的双渠道供应链博弈分析与协调[J]. 系统科学与数学, 2021, 41(8): 2276-2291.
[4]	王莹莉. 基于混合CVaR的供应链回购策略优化与协调研究[J]. 系统科学与数学, 2015, 35(11): 1304-1315.
[5]	禹海波，周端. 过度自信零售商供应链的得失共享回购契约模型[J]. 系统科学与数学, 2015, 35(1): 121-128.
[6]	肖成勇，王谦. 供应链协调中供应商的价格歧视策略[J]. 系统科学与数学, 2013, 33(7): 785-798.
[7]	肖成勇，王谦. 两层次广告博弈中供应商的一种]批发价协调策略[J]. 系统科学与数学, 2011, 31(11): 1504-1510.
[8]	李响，李勇建. 随机环境下考虑回收定价和销售定价的逆向供应链优化与协调研究[J]. 系统科学与数学, 2011, 31(11): 1511-1523.
[9]	杨丰梅, 成雅娜, 李健. 基于奖惩契约的闭环供应链协调性研究[J]. 系统科学与数学, 2011, 31(10): 1250-1258.
[10]	张海青, 田军. 采购方主导的基于能力期权契约的应急物资采购模型[J]. 系统科学与数学, 2011, 31(10): 1317-1327.
[11]	李健, 王伟, 杨丰梅. 基于三方回购契约的供应链库存调度协调研究[J]. 系统科学与数学, 2011, 31(10): 1363-1374.

阅读次数

全文

摘要