产出不确定条件下农产品供应链内部融资研究

doi:10.12341/jssms22256

系统科学与数学 ›› 2023, Vol. 43 ›› Issue (4): 914-928.DOI: 10.12341/jssms22256

• • 上一篇

产出不确定条件下农产品供应链内部融资研究

杨浩雄¹, 贾怡萌¹, 周永圣¹, 张京敏¹, 吴俊峰²

1. 北京工商大学电商与物流学院, 北京 100048;
2. 上海文景信息科技有限公司, 上海 200126

收稿日期:2022-04-13 修回日期:2022-09-16 发布日期:2023-05-18
通讯作者: 周永圣, Email:zhouys@amss.ac.cn
基金资助:
北京市哲学社会科学重点项目(15JGA026),北京市哲学社会科学项目(18GLC085)资助课题.

PDF ( 20 ) 引用

杨浩雄, 贾怡萌, 周永圣, 张京敏, 吴俊峰. 产出不确定条件下农产品供应链内部融资研究[J]. 系统科学与数学, 2023, 43(4): 914-928.

YANG Haoxiong, JIA Yimeng, ZHOU Yongsheng, ZHANG Jingmin, WU Junfeng. Internal Financing of Agricultural Product Supply Chain Under the Condition of Output Uncertainty[J]. Journal of Systems Science and Mathematical Sciences, 2023, 43(4): 914-928.

Internal Financing of Agricultural Product Supply Chain Under the Condition of Output Uncertainty

YANG Haoxiong¹, JIA Yimeng¹, ZHOU Yongsheng¹, ZHANG Jingmin¹, WU Junfeng²

1. School of E-Commerce and Logistics, Beijing Technology and Business University, Beijing 100048;
2. Shanghai WinJoin Information Technology Co., Ltd, Shanghai 200126

Received:2022-04-13 Revised:2022-09-16 Published:2023-05-18

农产品供应链的研究较少考虑农户资金不足, 供应链内部融资手段实现产销均衡的情况. 文章针对二级农产品供应链产出不确定, 构建核心企业为资金约束农户提供内部融资的模型, 通过求解最优化的农产品订购量、投产量并进行算例分析, 提出内部融资服务规则及最优生产运作策略.结果表明:在不考虑农户缺货成本和残值收益情况下,存在资金约束的农户倾向投入少于订购量的投产量来减少成本投入和还款金额, 实现自己期望收益最优;资金约束条件下采取分散决策,供应链成员存在最优的投产量和订购量使得自身期望收益实现最优;资金约束条件下, 文章设计的融资模式使得销售商的期望收益随着农户自有资金的增加而减少.

关键词： 产出不确定, 资金约束, 融资, 农产品, 供应链

The research on the supply chain of agricultural products seldom considers the shortage of farmers’ funds and the internal financing of the supply chain to achieve the balance of production and sales. In view of the uncertainty of the output of the secondary agricultural product supply chain, this paper builds a model in which core enterprises provide internal financing for farmers with financial constraints. Production operation strategy. The results show that: Without considering the outof-stock cost and residual value income of farmers, farmers with capital constraints tend to invest less than the amount ordered to reduce cost input and repayment amount, and achieve the optimal expected return; capital constraints under decentralized decision-making, the members of the supply chain have the optimal output and order quantity to optimize their expected returns; under the condition of capital constraints, the financing model designed in this paper makes the seller’s expected income decrease with the increase of farmers’ own funds.

Key words: Random yield, capital constraint, financing, agricultural products, supply chain

MR(2010)主题分类:

91B51

分享此文:

[1] 黄建辉, 叶飞, 周国林. 产出随机及贸易信用下农产品供应链农户决策与政府补偿价值.中国管理科学, 2018, 26(1):107-117. (Huang J H, Ye F, Zhou G L. Decisions and the value of government compensation in agricultural supply chain under trade credit and uncertainty of production yield. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2018, 26(1):107-117.)
[2] Ali J, Kumar S. Information and communication technologies (ICTs) and farmers' decisionmaking across the agricultural supply chain. International Journal of Information Management,2011, 31(2):149-159.
[3] Nong G, Pang S. Coordination of agricultural products supply chain with stochastic yield by price compensation. IERI Procedia, 2013, 5(5):118-125.
[4] 叶飞, 王吉璞. 产出不确定条件下"公司+农户"型订单农业供应链协商模型研究. 运筹与管理, 2017, 26(7):82-91. (Ye F, Wang J P. Negotiation model for "company + farmer" contract farming supply chain under random yield environment. International Journal of Information Management, 2017, 26(7):82- 91.)
[5] 王永龙, 蹇明. 考虑双边努力的农产品供应链风险分担组合契约设计. 系统科学学报, 2017, 25(4):70-74. (Wang Y L, Jian M. Risk sharing combined contract design of agricultural products supply chain considering the bilateral efforts. Chinese Journal of Systems Science, 2017, 25(4):70-74.)
[6] 凌六一, 郭晓龙, 胡中菊, 等. 基于随机产出与随机需求的农产品供应链风险共担合同.中国管理科学, 2013, 21(2):50-57. (Ling L Y, Guo X L, Hu Z J, et al. The risk-sharing contracts under random yield and stochastic demand in agricultural supply chain. International Journal of Production Research, 2013, 21(2):50-57.)
[7] 林强, 叶飞. "公司+农户"型订单农业供应链的Nash协商模型. 系统工程理论与实践, 2014, 34(7):1769-1778. (Lin Q, Ye F. Coordination for "company + farmer" contract-farming supply chain under Nash negotiation model. Systems Engineering-Theory & Practice, 2014, 34(7):1769-1778.)
[8] 张旭梅, 朱江华, 但斌, 等. 考虑补贴和公益性的生鲜冷链保鲜投入激励. 系统工程理论与实践, 2022, 42(3):738-754. (Zhang X M, Zhu J H, Dan B, et al. Research on the farmer's financing mode selection under stochastic yield and demand. Systems Engineering-Theory & Practice, 2022, 42(3):738-754.)
[9] Zare M, Esmaeili M, He Y J. Implications of risk-sharing strategies on supply chains with multiple retailers and under random yield. International Journal of Production Economics, 2019, 216:413-424.
[10] 姚冠新, 徐静. 产出不确定下的农产品供应链参与主体决策行为研究. 工业工程与管理, 2015, 111(2):16-22. (Yao G X, Xu J. Agricultural supply chain decisions research under random yield. Industrial Engineering and Management, 2015, 111(2):16-22.)
[11] Yang H, Zhuo W, Shao L. Equilibrium evolution in a two-echelon supply chain with financially constrained retailers:The impact of equity financing. International Journal of Production Economics, 2017, 185:139-149.)
[12] Yan N, Sun B, Zhang H, et al. A partial credit guarantee contract in a capital-constrained supply chain:Financing equilibrium and coordinating strategy. International Journal of Production Economics, 2016, 173:122-133.
[13] Chen X. A model of trade credit in a capital-constrained distribution channel. International Journal of Production Economics, 2015, 159:347-357.
[14] 张义刚, 唐小我. 部分延期付款下的制造商决策与供应链协调. 管理学报, 2012, 9(10):1536-1542. (Zhang Y G, Tang X W. Manufacturer's decision and supply chain coordination under partial delay in payments. Journal of Management, 2012, 9(10):1536-1542.)
[15] 李超, 骆建文. 基于预付款的资金约束供应链收益共享协调机制. 管理学报, 2016, 13(5):763-771. (Li C, Luo J W. Revenue-sharing coordination mechanism for a financial constrained supply chain based on advance payment. Journal of Management, 2016, 13(5):763-771.)
[16] Wang T R, Lan Q G, Chu Y Z. Supply chain financing model:Based on China's agricultural products supply chain. Applied Mechanics and Materials, 2013, 380-384:4417-4421.
[17] 叶飞, 黄建辉, 林强. 资金约束下订单农业供应链中的农户最优决策. 系统工程理论与实践, 2017, 37(6):1467-1478. (Ye F, Huang J H, Lin Q. The optimal production strategies of the farmer in contract-farming supply chain under capital constraint. Systems Engineering-Theory & Practice, 2017, 37(6):1467-1478.)
[18] Zhang C, Tian Y X, Fan L W, et al. Optimal ordering policy for a retailer with consideration of customer credit under two-level trade credit financing. Operational Research, 2021, 21(4):2409-2432.
[19] 金小丹, 周泓. 需求分布未知下的供应链融资及鲁棒订购策略. 系统工程理论与实践, 2021, 41(5):1263-1271. (Jin X D, Zhou H. Joint supply chain finance and robust order decision with unknown distribution of demand. Systems Engineering-Theory & Practice, 2021, 41(5):1263-1271.)
[20] 冯颖, 王远芳, 张炎治, 等. 随机产出下商务模式对生鲜农产品供应链运作的影响. 系统工程理论与实践, 2020, 40(10):2631-2647. (Feng Y, Wang Y F, Zhang Y Z, et al. Impact of business model on operation of the fresh agriproduct supply chain under random output. Systems Engineering-Theory & Practice, 2020, 40(10):2631-2647.)

[1]	孙彩虹, 李振, 于辉. 产出不确定下易逝品限量预售鲁棒策略分析[J]. 系统科学与数学, 2023, 43(4): 898-913.
[2]	覃燕红, 王少杰. 不利天气影响下考虑农户公平关切的农产品供应链协调机制研究[J]. 系统科学与数学, 2023, 43(3): 595-609.
[3]	舒亚东, 代颖, 马祖军. 考虑公平关注的闭环供应链进化博弈理论分析[J]. 系统科学与数学, 2023, 43(3): 651-666.
[4]	曾能民, 任万强, 郭秋平. 随机需求下专利供应链的不完全契约设计[J]. 系统科学与数学, 2023, 43(3): 738-756.
[5]	孙嘉轶, 李洁, 姚锋敏. 回收商资金约束的电商闭环供应链融资策略研究[J]. 系统科学与数学, 2023, 43(3): 757-779.
[6]	代建生,李春玲. 随机需求下考虑公平偏好的合作广告协调模型[J]. 系统科学与数学, 2023, 43(2): 323-341.
[7]	南江霞,李明月,吴小勇,张茂军. 基于区块链技术下两条竞争供应链的策略选择[J]. 系统科学与数学, 2023, 43(2): 452-477.
[8]	王道平, 丁婧一, 周玉. 不同权力结构下考虑消费者后悔预期的再制造供应链定价研究[J]. 系统科学与数学, 2023, 43(1): 114-128.
[9]	朱宏泉, 陈诗韵, 李亚静. 腐败对企业股权融资成本的影响研究——基于新股发行的视角[J]. 系统科学与数学, 2022, 42(9): 2412-2431.
[10]	姜旭, 卓越, 姜西雅. 政府补贴下基于供应链社会责任的回收模式研究[J]. 系统科学与数学, 2022, 42(9): 2448-2461.
[11]	文学舟, 张盛达. 基于微分博弈的商业银行与互联网金融平台的合作策略分析[J]. 系统科学与数学, 2022, 42(9): 2462-2481.
[12]	林志炳, 林锡桦, 陈莫凡. 考虑退货和企业社会责任下的双渠道供应链产品质量策略研究[J]. 系统科学与数学, 2022, 42(8): 2062-2074.
[13]	李红萍, 龚本刚, 党秀静, 陈久美. 基于信用保险的供应链决策模型与协调策略研究[J]. 系统科学与数学, 2022, 42(8): 2180-2197.
[14]	申亮, 范润婕, 王玉燕. 基于利他偏好的低碳ECSC定价服务决策与协调[J]. 系统科学与数学, 2022, 42(7): 1788-1804.
[15]	于晓辉, 张志强, 于亚南. 考虑消费者偏好的绿色供应链补贴绩效研究[J]. 系统科学与数学, 2022, 42(4): 818-831.

阅读次数

全文

摘要