无缺陷退货下考虑转运的双渠道供应链库存决策研究

doi:10.12341/jssms21556

系统科学与数学 ›› 2022, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (11): 2973-2997.DOI: 10.12341/jssms21556

• • 上一篇

无缺陷退货下考虑转运的双渠道供应链库存决策研究

冯平平¹, 张婷丹¹, 柴建¹, 吴锋²

1. 西安电子科技大学经济与管理学院, 西安 710071;
2. 西安交通大学管理学院, 西安 710049

收稿日期:2021-10-03 修回日期:2022-06-27 发布日期:2022-12-13
通讯作者: 冯平平, Email: ppfeng@xidian.edu.cn
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金(71901170, 71874133,71871177, 72102174), 陕西省“高层次人才特殊支持计划”青年拔尖人才,陕西高校青年创新团队资助课题,教育部人文社会科学基金项目(21XJC630004), 陕西省自然科学基础研究项目(2021JM-144), 中央高校基本科研业务费(RW210103, JBF220602)资助课题.

PDF ( 19 ) 引用

冯平平, 张婷丹, 柴建, 吴锋. 无缺陷退货下考虑转运的双渠道供应链库存决策研究[J]. 系统科学与数学, 2022, 42(11): 2973-2997.

FENG Pingping, ZHANG Tingdan, CHAI Jian, WU Feng. Research on Inventory Decisions in a Dual-Channel Supply Chain with False Failure Returns and Transshipment[J]. Journal of Systems Science and Mathematical Sciences, 2022, 42(11): 2973-2997.

Research on Inventory Decisions in a Dual-Channel Supply Chain with False Failure Returns and Transshipment

FENG Pingping¹, ZHANG Tingdan¹, CHAI Jian¹, WU Feng²

1. School of Economics and Management, Xidian University, Xi'an 710071;
2. School of Management, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an 710049

Received:2021-10-03 Revised:2022-06-27 Published:2022-12-13

电商环境下无缺陷退货的大幅增加给供应链带来新的挑战.文章针对一个供应商和一个零售商组成的双渠道供应链, 结合无缺陷退货可再次销售的特征, 考虑某一渠道缺货后顾客等待转运和顾客需求转移两种行为, 分别在集中决策和分散决策模式下, 基于无转运无转移(NN)、有转运无转移(YN)和有转运有转移(YY)三种情境构建无缺陷退货下的转运与库存决策模型. 研究求解并比较了各情境下的最优决策, 并且分析了转运价格、无缺陷退货率和顾客需求转移率对最优订货量及系统利润的影响. 研究表明, 考虑转运和顾客需求转移时,双渠道供应链中供应商和零售商库存水平及利润同时受到两渠道退货率的影响. 通过设置合理的转运价格, 转运策略可以有效地降低退货压力, 提高库存管理效率, 增加双渠道供应链利润. 然而, 顾客需求转移会降低转运策略的有效性.

关键词： 双渠道供应链, 无缺陷退货, 横向转运, 顾客需求转移

With the development of e-commerce, many suppliers sell products through both direct online channel and traditional retail channel. Substantial false failure returns in the online channel have brought great challenges for supply chain management. Considering the fact that false failure returns can be resold, this paper investigates the transshipment and inventory decisions in a dual-channel supply chain consisting of one supplier and one retailer. Three scenarios with false failure returns are considered: 1) When there is no transshipment and no customer switch (NN); 2) when transshipment is considered with no customer switch (YN); 3) when transshipment is considered with customer switch (YY). We compare the optimal decisions across different scenarios and analyze the impacts of transshipment price, false failure returns rate and customer demand switch rate on optimal order quantity and system profit. The results show that when considering transshipment and customer demand switch, the inventory levels and profits of suppliers and retailers are simultaneously affected by the false failure returns rate of both channels. Suppliers and retailers can effectively reduce false failure returns loss and improve inventory management efficiency with transshipment strategies. However, when considering customer demand switch, transshipment strategies will be less effective. It is of practical significance to consider false failure returns and customer demand switching when supply chain members make the inventory and transshipment decisions.

Key words: Dual-channel supply chain, false failure returns, lateral transshipment, consumer demand switch

MR(2010)主题分类:

91B06

分享此文:

[1] Li Y J, Xu L, Li D H. Examining relationships between the return policy, product quality, and pricing strategy in online direct selling. International Journal of Production Economics, 2013, 144(2): 451-460.
[2] 汪峻萍, 杨剑波, 贾兆丽.基于无缺陷退货的网上销售易逝品供应链协调模型.中国管理科学, 2013, 21(6): 47-56. (Wang J P, Yang J B, Jia Z L. Supply chain coordination model for perishable product through online sales with false failure returns. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2013, 21(6): 47-56.)
[3] Vlachos D, Dekker R. Return handling options and order quantities for single period products. European Journal of Operational Research, 2003, 151(1): 38-52.
[4] Ferguson M, Guide V D R, Souza G C. Supply chain coordination for false failure returns. Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, 2006, 8(4): 376-393.
[5] Ofek E, Katona Z, Sarvary M. “Bricks and Clicks”: The impact of product returns on the strategies of multichannel retailers. Marketing Science, 2011, 30(1): 42-60.
[6] 徐琪, 刘峥, 汤兵勇. 双渠道供应链库存协调合作策略.系统工程, 2015, 33(3): 45-51. (Xu Q, Liu Z, Tang B Y. Inventory coordination strategies of dual-channel supply chain. Systems Engineering, 2015, 2015, 33(3): 45-51.)
[7] Li W, Chen J, Liang G Q, et al. Money-back guarantee and personalized pricing in a Stackelberg manufacturer's dual-channel supply chain. International Journal of Production Economics, 2018, 197: 84-98.
[8] 赵菊, 张强, 程薇嘉. B2C零售商退货渠道策略研究.运筹与管理, 2019, 28(12): 130-136. (Zhao J, Zhang Q, Cheng W J. Research on B2C retailer return channel strategy. Operations Research and Management Science, 2019, 28(12): 130-136.)
[9] Chen J, Chen B T, Li W. Who should be pricing leader in the presence of customer returns? European Journal of Operational Research, 2018, 265(2): 735-747.
[10] 赵骞, 孙燕红, 斯琴塔娜. 基于消费者机会主义行为的退货担保服务策略.系统科学与数学, 2019, 39(6): 888-903. (Zhao Q, Sun Y H, SiQin T N. Optimal return and insurance service strategies for online retailers in the presence of opportunistic consumers. Journal of Systems Science and Mathematical Sciences, 2019, 39(6): 888-903.)
[11] Shulman J D, Coughlan A T, Savaskan R C. Managing consumer returns in a competitive environment. Management Science, 2011, 57(2): 347-362.
[12] 何莹莹, 郭春香.预售模式下基于策略型消费者退货行为的运费险决策研究.管理学报, 2018, 15(8): 1249-1255. (He Y Y, Guo C X. Study on freight insurance decision making with consideration of strategic consumer returns in the pre-sale. Chinese Journal of Management, 2018, 15(8): 1249-1255.)
[13] 孙军, 孙亮. 基于无缺陷退货的在线零售商运费承担策略研究.软科学, 2014, 28(6): 41-45. (Sun J, Sun L. Study on on-line retailers' freight commitment policy under non-defective returns. & Soft Science, 2014, 28(6): 41-45.)
[14] 汪传旭, 魏倩丽, 许长延. 不确定环境下两级供应链转运替代策略.计算机集成制造系统, 2015, 21(2): 537-545. (Wang C X, Wei Q L, Xu C Y. Transshipment and substitution policies in two stage supply chain under uncertain environment. Computer Integrated Manufacturing Systems, 2015, 21(2): 537-545.)
[15] 徐琪, 高晓晴. 考虑信息共享情形下的共享平台库存订购与再分配策略研究. 管理学报, 2019, 16(11): 1719-1728. (Xu Q, Gao X Q. Optimal ordering and inventory reallocating decision based on shared platform under information sharing. Chinese Journal of Management, 2019, 16(11): 1719-1728.)
[16] 蹇明, 刘同. 损失规避型零售商库存共享策略. 计算机集成制造系统, 2017, 23(9): 2012-2019. (Jian M, Liu T. Research on inventory sharing strategy of loss adverse retailer. Computer Integrated Manufacturing Systems, 2017, 23(9): 2012-2019.)
[17] Feng P P, Wu F, Richard Y K F, et al. The order and transshipment decisions in a two-location inventory system with demand forecast updates. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 2019, 135: 53-66.
[18] 徐琪, 高晓晴. 共享库存下双渠道零售商最优订购与转运价格决策. 工业工程与管理, 2020, 25(1): 110-117, 126. (Xu Q, Gao X Q. Optimal ordering and transshipment price decision for dual channel retailers under sharing inventory. Industrial Engineering and Management, 2020, 25(1): 110-117, 126.)
[19] Liao Y, Li J, Hu X X, et al. Application of lateral transshipment in cost reduction of decentralized systems. Sustainability, 2020, 12(12): 5081.
[20] 樊相宇, 胡博雅, 武小平.考虑无缺陷退货下零售商转运的供应链回购契约研究.中国管理科学, 2021, 29(7): 139-147. (Fan X Y, Hu B Y, Wu X P. Research on buyback contract of supply chain with retailer transshipment considering false failure return. Chinese Journal of Management Science, 2021, 29(7): 139-147.)
[21] Aslani A, Heydari J. Transshipment contract for coordination of a green dual-channel supply chain under channel disruption. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2019, 223: 596-609.
[22] Zhao F G, Wu D S, Liang L, et al. Lateral inventory transshipment problem in online-to-offline supply chain. International Journal of Production Research, 2016, 54(7): 1951-1963.
[23] Fan D D, Xu Q, Fan T J, et al. Inventory optimization model considering consumer shift and inventory transshipment in dual-channel supply chains. RAIRO-Operations Research, 2019, 53(1): 59-79.
[24] 赵秋红, 朱少楠, 李安楠.存在顾客购买转移的双分销渠道订货与库存转运策略. 系统工程理论与实践, 2014, 34(6): 1453-1461. (Zhao Q H, Zhu S N, Li A N. Ordering and transshipment strategies of dual-distribution channels with customers switching. Systems Engineering — Theory & Practice, 2014, 34(6): 1453-1461.)
[25] 樊双蛟, 王旭坪. 退货再次销售的在线零售定价与订货联合决策. 系统工程理论与实践, 2018, 38(1): 113-121. (Fan S J, Wang X P. Joint pricing and ordering decision based on resales of custom returns in online retailing. Systems Engineering — Theory & Practice, 2018, 38(1): 113-121.)
[26] 王道平, 周玉, 葛根哈斯.考虑参照价格效应和消费者行为的预售及退货策略研究. 控制与决策, 2021, 36(11): 2783-2793. (Wang D P, Zhou Y, GeGen H S. Advance selling strategy and return strategy considering reference price effect and consumers behaviors. Control and Decision, 2021, 36(11): 2783-2793.)
[27] 贺庆仁, 但斌, 杨家权,等. 退货约束下供应商主导调拨的订货与定价模型. 系统工程学报, 2017, 32(5): 660-673. (He Q R, Dan B, Yang J Q, et al. Ordering and pricing model of supplier-dominated transshipment with return constraints. Journal of Systems Engineering, 2017, 32(5): 660-673.)
[28] Feng P P, Wu F, Richard Y K F, et al. Evaluation of two transshipment policies in a two-location decentralized inventory system under partial backordering. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 2018, 118: 207-224.
[29] Herer Y T, Rashit A. Lateral stock transshipments in a two-location inventory system with fixed and joint replenishment costs. Naval Research Logistics: An International Journal, 1999, 46(5): 525-547.

[1]	林志炳, 林锡桦, 陈莫凡. 考虑退货和企业社会责任下的双渠道供应链产品质量策略研究[J]. 系统科学与数学, 2022, 42(8): 2062-2074.
[2]	吴江, 杜亚倩, 张聊东. 考虑产品绿色度的双渠道供应链博弈分析与协调[J]. 系统科学与数学, 2021, 41(8): 2276-2291.
[3]	于晓辉, 李敏, 叶兆兴, 周珍, 逄金辉. 基于公平关切的双渠道低碳供应链博弈分析[J]. 系统科学与数学, 2021, 41(1): 221-237.
[4]	张霖霖，杨越，周永圣，张京敏. 考虑顾客退货的风险规避双渠道供应链协调机制研究[J]. 系统科学与数学, 2020, 40(11): 2017-2040.
[5]	周义廷, 刘丽文. 考虑零售商公平关切的双渠道闭环供应链决策与协调研究[J]. 系统科学与数学, 2017, 37(9): 1930-1948.
[6]	周义廷，刘丽文. 考虑随机需求和搭便车行为的双渠道供应链决策模型[J]. 系统科学与数学, 2017, 37(1): 66-78.

阅读次数

全文

摘要