Previous Articles     Next Articles

Illiquidity Comovement and Market Crisis

ZENG Qingduo1, ZHANG Qiang2, LIU Shancun3, YANG Yaodong4   

  1. 1. School of Economics and Commerce, Guangdong University of Technology, Guangzhou 510520, China;
    2. School of Economics and Management, Beijing University of Chemical Technology, Beijing 100029, China;
    3. School of Economics and Management, Beihang University, Beijing 100191, China;
    4. Department of Computer Science, University College London, London, UK.
  • Received:2020-11-26 Revised:2021-06-06 Online:2022-10-25 Published:2022-10-12
  • Supported by:
    This paper was supported by China Postdoctoral Science Foundation under Grant No.2019M660424,the National Natural Science Foundation of China under Grant Nos.71771008 and 71803029,Guangdong Province Philosophy and Social Science Planning Project under Grant No.GD21YYJ10.

ZENG Qingduo, ZHANG Qiang, LIU Shancun, YANG Yaodong. Illiquidity Comovement and Market Crisis[J]. Journal of Systems Science and Complexity, 2022, 35(5): 1863-1874.

This paper presents a rational expectation equilibrium model to explore how the financial contagion occurs between the unlinked markets that do not share common fundamentals.In the proposed model,the authors assume two of the three risky assets share no common fundamental factors,but are connected by one intermediate asset via cross fundamentals.Through this channel,investors transmit fundamental risk from one asset to another by dint of the cross fundamentals.This mechanism causes liquidity comovement and subsequently becomes a source of market crisis:Through the contagion mechanism,an initial liquidity shock in one asset can result in a drop tendency in liquidity and price informativeness for another asset.Such comovement in liquidity offers a new explanation for idiosyncratic assets in financial contagion.
[1] Yuan K, Asymmetric price movements and borrowing constraints:A rational expectations equilibrium model of crises, contagion, and confusion, Journal of Finance, 2005, 60(1):379-411.
[2] Goldstein I, Li Y, and Yang L, Speculation and hedging in segmented markets, Review of Financial Studies, 2013, 27(3):881-922.
[3] Cespa G and Foucault T, Illiquidity contagion and liquidity crashes, The Review of Financial Studies, 2014, 27(6):1615-1660.
[4] Kodres L E and Pritsker M, A rational expectations model of financial contagion, The Journal of Finance, 2002, 57(2):769-799.
[5] Vives X, Information and Learning in Markets:The Impact of Market Microstructure, Princeton University Press, Princeton, 2010.
[6] Smith R T and Schinasi G J, Portfolio diversification, leverage, and financial contagion, IMF Staff Papers, 2000, 47(2):159-176.
[7] Grossman S J and Stiglitz J E, On the impossibility of informationally efficient markets, The American Economic Review, 1980, 70(3):393-408.
[8] Zeng Q, Liu S, Zhang Q, et al., Information acquisition:Fundamental and non-fundamental, Journal of Management Science and Engineering, 2018, 3(2):59-75.
[9] Calvo G A, Contagion in emerging markets:When Wall Street is a carrier, Latin American Economic Crises, Palgrave Macmillan, London, 2004.
[10] Allen F and Gale D, Financial contagion, Journal of Political Economy, 2000, 108(1):1-33.
[11] Longstaff F A, The subprime credit crisis and contagion in financial markets, Journal of Financial Economics, 2010, 97(3):436-450.
[12] Zeng Q, Liu S, and Zhang Q, Common sentiment and price contagion, Journal of Systems Science&Complexity, 2019, 32(5):1426-1437.
[13] Paul J M, Crowding out and the informativeness of security prices, The Journal of Finance, 1993, 48(4):1475-1496.
[14] Vives X, Short-term investment and the informational efficiency of the market, The Review of Financial Studies, 1995, 8(1):125-160.
[15] Mondria J, Vives X, and Yang L, Costly interpretation of asset prices, Management Science, 2022, 68(1):52-74.
[16] Bernhardt D and Taub B, Cross-asset speculation in stock markets, The Journal of Finance, 2008, 63(5):2385-2427.
[1] ZHANG Lili,ZHANG Xun,CHENG Ke. Construction and Analysis of Common Foreign Trade Cycle Based on MS-VAR: An Empirical Study of Global Experience [J]. Journal of Systems Science and Complexity, 2015, 28(2): 360-380.
Full text